Ballistic Gelatin Test 223 5.56 Ar15 Part 11 Of 12




What do you think about this video?

robin6512: @TheAK47nut i'll go for the 7.62 too but i wouldn't try to catch the .223 ..... lol

1lostinspace: lol 5.56 is nasty!! It tumbles and frags it has to be going 2800 fps

Tuxedo413: How far do you think it goes in before it starts to yaw or fragment?

drchen054: hard to say im not a gun expert but I suspect the 5.56 has a flatter trajectory up to 800 yards but after that, a heavier bullet like the 7.62 would be more accurate with single burst.

f8talh8red: wheres part 12???

dadajack yo: but firing at a distance over 500 yards, which bullet has the better chance of actually hitting the target?

dadajack yo: People love to hate on the 5.56 cause they heard it goes right through skinny people. Guess what, the 7.62 does also. The difference, in inches, between a 7.63 and 5.56 is .075". The energy difference between 7.62x39 and 5.56 is 200ft/lb. I know you have to pick one as your favorite, and mine is 5.56 for SD/HD and 7.62x39 for plinking or hunting. Plus, 5.56 is much more accurate in my own personal experience. I like a flatter shooting round.

bazookajoethethird: @ericvandermolen and the 5.56 has the "tumbling" effect

BWT68: @SacTownStudios Exactly, the bullet structure fails mid yaw and comes apart. Which is what it was designed to do. Hornady 75 gr 5.56x45 TAP (Not .223 REM) can fragment out to 160-180 yards out of I believe a 16'' barrel. It fragments out to a hundred out of a 10-ish inch barrel. Which is again optimal. I mean don't get me wrong, I pickup my SGL21-71 tomorrow at my FFL's. But 5.56x45mm would be great for home defense, etc. 7.62x39mm FMJ will punch through walls/cars, etc which is good and bad.

Nick Varnadore: Do a 77gr 5.56 round

SweStuff94: @TheAK47nut dosent it waw bc of the round being back heavy and bc of the refeling of the gun? sry 4 my english :)

girlmalibu1: All in all the .223 is a nasty round and I bet no one wants to get hit by it.

Bobby Johnson: This round is awesome

1337ASM: @TheAK47nut And, from a logistical stand point, the 7.62x39 is great, since it is used in the most popular weapon in the world.

69mrkfc: tie the block down

Airen Farmer: The rifiling of the barrel, and velocity of the bullet causes the trajectory to change direction in flesh and ballistic gel. but yea that gel is pretty clear.

dadajack yo: I suppose I should have quantified the question by mentioning the platforms. The difference between the 7.62 and 5.56 in my experience would suggest I have a much greater chance of landing a round on target with a 5.56. Now, compare a 5.56 with a .308, I'll take the .308 for down rage energy with the possibility of being as accurate with the available platforms...

drchen054: depending on the distance right? 5.56 at over 500 yards isn't going to fragment.

TheAK47nut: I think the 762 wins after seeing it up close and personal!!

youDISTURBEDme14: yes..

sotik: Guys when you have a exits hole in the front gel on the top, and a entrance hole in the second gel on the top. This means that the problem lies in the gel blocks moving while the bullet is traveling through them. It has nothing to do with the bullet. Either weigh those things down or strap them down.

NastyChuck: @TheAK47nut How long was the barrel that the 5.56 was shot out of?

Ignacio Mendez: Suggestion, please upload a 5.45x39 ballistic gel video, and also would like to comment. I personally believe that the 5.56(223) is a far more lethal round then the 7.62x39; you got fragmentation of the round, you got precision, you got more bullets to carry with you(in combat). Not only does it fragment, but it fragments at the right time, where the organs would be(given the right placement of the shot.)

FJones9508: Sac almost hit it on the head. The bullet is so light and traveling so fast that the front tries to slow down and the back keeps trying to go fast. Back in the day when the M16 had 1 in 11 rifling the yaw used to be so bad that it would take peoples arms off and cleave the top of a head off. Hollow points in .223 can be quite devastating also.

DARTHxPOOH: There is no such thing like "Stopping power"

dxxa94: @TheAK47nut yea AK-47 RULES but 5.56 hav 2 frags and AK hav more power and penetration :p

PatandNicole: These guys don't realize there gel is not a consistent blend

GTILOUD: @ignaciom184 Both have 30 rd mags, 5.56 would weigh less by what 3 ounces? Same amount of ammo though, there are 7.62x39 ammo that reliably fragments. I can't argue that after 300 meters the 5.56 is more accurate, however if I am shooting something 300+ meters away in self defense I have bigger problems. The 7.62 ammo is wayy cheaper for hunting or shooting for fun even hp sp ammo is significantly cheaper than lc 5.56 just by a Arsenal ak to support U.S economy.

Bari Servello: I can fix the problem. the gel is moving as the goes in. just place types bricks on top of the gel and it will go straight.

andrew coleman: You must have been standing when you took the shot. Firing into the block from a postion higher than the block itself will cause a "rock skipping" effect.

Jack Attack: Thanks very much for posting this online, it is a great resource for people trying to learn about the performance of various calibers and loads. I will use it to teach some friends about ballistics when I give them a basic rifle class later. Take care.

Infiniti350gt: Amazing to see how much a .223 or 5.56 really tumbles and turns in a target. I've noticed in the past that longer distances are easier to test like this because you see the real damaging effect of the 5.56 when it moves around a lot more. Up close I've had the same things happen ripping through the gel or just not yielding the results I was looking for. Nice test.

Angel Fernandez: you guys need to put some weight on that gel so it does not flip up and cause the round to come out.

EZ2anger: I think both are almost a guaranteed one shot stop, it's just a matter of situation or preference. The 7.62 will penetrate most kinds of cover and armor, but it has to rely more on hydrostatic shock to kill, whereas the 5.56 relies more on tissue damage and is less likely to exit a target.

ericvandermolen: I think the .223 will do a lot more internal damage because of the fragmenting it does (though this vid doesn't fragment), but the 7.62 has more stopping power. If you want to knock someone down on the first shot, I would go with the 7.62. Don't know if you saw the 7.62 hp vid that this guy has up, but the ballistics gel gets pushed back so far with that bullet.

TheAK47nut: @robin6512 Ooh come on if you use your teeth youll be fine!! ;-)

youDISTURBEDme14: the 7.62 has more power and force than the 5.56 but if you shoot a 7.62 fmj it will likely go straight through them. on the other hand, the 5.56 travels much faster than the 7.62 and fragments causing internal organs to turn into jelly. there aren't very many people who have survived a 5.56 gunshot but many people have survived 7.62 wounds because the 7.62 fmj wont tear apart like the 5.56. 7.62 soft points are a whole different story. those will beat any 5.56 bullet any day of the week.

dxxa94: Yes the 5.56 nato hav 2 fragments

SacTownStudios: What people need to understand is that the 5.56 is fast and small so it doesn't have a lot of punch to it. It's the yawing and/or fragmentation of the round that makes it effective because the tumbling/explosion of the round causes more damage than if it went straight through. And what makes the round tumble is the fact that the bullet is traveling so fast that the lighter front end wants to stop but the heavier back end wants to keep going (do to momentum) causing instability and yawing.

MachoCamachoZ: @sotik I spotted this too, especially in the 9th or 10th video. You can see the front curl up.

UncleFexxer: It's not the nature of the round, it's the nature of your blocks flopping around under impact.

john h: The reason the 223 is "yawing" is most likely do to rifling twist ratio and bullet weight.

School: Thanks for teaching us how to fix it. The problem with most Medical assistant in california is usually the cost of education. Hopefully it'll pay off. Thanks again.
Rating:
ballistic gelatin test 223 5.56 ar15 part 11 of 12 4.8 out of 5

Shared by Others

ballistic gelatin test 223 5.56 ar15 part 11 of 12
ballistic gelatin test 223 5.56 ar15 part 11 of 12
ballistic gelatin test .223 5.56 part 9 of 12
ballistic gelatin test .223 5.56 part 9 of 12
5.56mm NATO XM193:  Drywall & Ballistic Gel Test
5.56mm NATO XM193: Drywall & Ballistic Gel Test
AR15 AR-15 ammo test: Winchester PDX1 .223 Defender in ballistic gelatin
AR15 AR-15 ammo test: Winchester PDX1 .223 Defender in ballistic gelatin
AR-15 AR15 ammo test: M193 XM193F 5.56 NATO in ballistic gelatin
AR-15 AR15 ammo test: M193 XM193F 5.56 NATO in ballistic gelatin
CLEAR GEL TEST:  5.56mm NATO 55 gr FMJ
CLEAR GEL TEST: 5.56mm NATO 55 gr FMJ
5.56mm 200 Yard Steel & Ballistic Gel Penetration
5.56mm 200 Yard Steel & Ballistic Gel Penetration
210 YARDS BALLISTICS GEL TEST:  .223 Hornady Superformance Varmint V-MAX
210 YARDS BALLISTICS GEL TEST: .223 Hornady Superformance Varmint V-MAX
ballistic gelatin test 5.56 55gr ball part 10 of 12
ballistic gelatin test 5.56 55gr ball part 10 of 12
Speer LE Gold Dot 223 64gr GDSP Ballistics Gel Test (#24448)
Speer LE Gold Dot 223 64gr GDSP Ballistics Gel Test (#24448)
AMMO TEST:  5.56mm Hornady Superformance Match 75 gr BTHP
AMMO TEST: 5.56mm Hornady Superformance Match 75 gr BTHP
ZOMBIE MAX!!!  .223 Remington 55 gr Z-MAX Ammo Test
ZOMBIE MAX!!! .223 Remington 55 gr Z-MAX Ammo Test
G2 RIP R.I.P. ammo review Part II: vs. Federal HST in ballistic gel. denim. and plywood
G2 RIP R.I.P. ammo review Part II: vs. Federal HST in ballistic gel. denim. and plywood
American Eagle 223 Rem Tipped Varmint 50 gr Ballistic Gel Test
American Eagle 223 Rem Tipped Varmint 50 gr Ballistic Gel Test
CMMG Gas Piston 5.56 AR15 Upper
CMMG Gas Piston 5.56 AR15 Upper
5.56x45 NATO vs .223 Rem
5.56x45 NATO vs .223 Rem
G2 RIP R.I.P. 9mm Radically Invasive Projectile tested in ballistic gel test review
G2 RIP R.I.P. 9mm Radically Invasive Projectile tested in ballistic gel test review
5.56x45mm US M856 Tracer Slow Motion ballistic gelatin
5.56x45mm US M856 Tracer Slow Motion ballistic gelatin
ballistic gelatin test wolf 7.62x39 hp part 5 of 12
ballistic gelatin test wolf 7.62x39 hp part 5 of 12
Hornady TAP 5.56x45mm. 75gr BTHP/WC T2* vs Pork Shoulder
Hornady TAP 5.56x45mm. 75gr BTHP/WC T2* vs Pork Shoulder
Concrete Block Shootout - 9mm. 45ACP. 5.56mm. 7.62mm. 300WSM. 338 WIN Mag. 12ga
Concrete Block Shootout - 9mm. 45ACP. 5.56mm. 7.62mm. 300WSM. 338 WIN Mag. 12ga
ballistic gelatin test 7.62x39 fmj brown bear part 2 of 12
ballistic gelatin test 7.62x39 fmj brown bear part 2 of 12
Black Hills .223 Ballistic gelatin test
Black Hills .223 Ballistic gelatin test
Federal 5.56 T556TNB1 62gr OTM Mod0 (SOST) Ballistics Gel Test (HD)
Federal 5.56 T556TNB1 62gr OTM Mod0 (SOST) Ballistics Gel Test (HD)
M855 versus Ballistic Gelatin
M855 versus Ballistic Gelatin
5.56 Incendiary (API) vs. AR500 ArmorĀ® Level III Body Armor
5.56 Incendiary (API) vs. AR500 ArmorĀ® Level III Body Armor

Featured Video

How to Make Money Online


ballistic gelatin test 223 5.56 ar15 part 11 of 12