michael meixsell: In reality this guy really loves Springfield XD's. He's just trying to get
views and possible subscriptions. Thumbs down.
BenB8290: Basically, your complaint about the XD is that its overpriced because its
Croatian made and used to be much cheaper, because SA hadn't slapped their
name on it? First off, what's the issue with Croatia? Because its a third
world eastern European country? I guess AK's suck because they're from a
second world former Soviet republic. Secondly, who cares if SA puts thier
name on them? They import them to make money; we're a capitalist society.
Just as your criticism with the Ruger P-series; you personally don't like
them. That's all. You admittedly stated both systems do what they're
supposed to do. This is purely opinion driven on your part. Objectively,
XD's do not suck.
Dillan Addington: Its funny how you also have a video called "Glocks arent safe, XDs are
Paul Goodell: XD's are overpriced and inferior to Glock. Are Gen4 Glocks pos's now since
they obviously took cues from Springfield and started offering features
like interchangeable grip inserts and dual guide rod springs? At least
Glock didn't go so far as to offer a "1911 grip angle" feature so it still
feels like you got your wife's freakin' hair dryer in your hand. LOL
mopar tech: I have several pistols and I was looking to add to the collection. so the
guy at one of the local gun stores was telling how great the XDM is. I am
not one to just buy a firearm just because someone tells me how great
something is, THEY ARE SALESMAN, and that's there job. So I went to the
range where I am a member and rented a 9MM XDM. took my Glock 17 and my HK
PV9, and my SW MP all 9MM. now I shoot a lot, every week. And after renting
the XDM I wish I had my my back. we all know the reputation of Glocks ,
love them or hate them there great pistols. The HK PV9 and the mp series
are much better shooting pistols. when you have them all laying on a bench
going from one to the other XDM is the looser.
JetMechMA: People are bashing him for not pointing out physical flaws with the
XD....but a gun can suck for being priced too high....his point. He's
saying the XD is overpriced. I see people complain about the price of a
certain thing, but they choose to pay the price anyway. That's foolish. Be
a man and if that product is over-priced....just say NO. Don't buy the
over-priced item. That will force the manufacturer to lower the price.
Sometimes you have to just walk away from a deal even though you want it
really bad. Don't fall victim to price gouging. The consumer has the
FunkyPertwee: A Springfield XD is $400 on Bud's right now so I'm not sure what this guy
is complaining about. Basically your only point is that you don't like the
name. $400 in 2014 equals $300 in 2001 so its not like the price is even
higher anymore. PAy extra for XDM if you want the cool Batman look.
Also the Ruger P-series is out of production. The SR series of striker
fired pistols can be had for under $400.
Blatant Abuse: If your opinion is that the XD is equal in quality as the Ruger P series,
my opinion is that you don't know just how bad the P series is. My opinion
is that the XD is of higher quality than Glock. It is just as reliable,
has a more robust and well made frame, and significant advancements in
ergonomics. And it's prettier. I think they used to charge for the XD
what the market would bear. Now they've gone down significantly if I'm not
mistaken. I saw XDsc's for under $400 this weekend.
Sam Don: No gun should be over 300.00 dollars. But if a company makes a product and
the demand goes up. The price goes up duh.
Dixie Land: To be honest Glock is way overpriced too
Big Dave: Well sir thank you for making me feel terrible about my XD lol. IDK man I
love mine I have the XD 45 and love it but hey whatever man your more
educated about it then me.
Brian Mumford: Are XD's overpriced, or were they under priced when they were initially
marketed by a relatively unknown company (HS Produkt)? Glock used to be
considered a joke too. A polymer frame??? You say it's a "good" firearm,
but "let's be honest, it's not a $600-$650 gun, it never was, it never will
be." What evidence do you have that they're worth less than anything else
in that range? Shoddy materials? Shoddy workmanship? I've only heard good
things about their production in general. Yes, they had a recall, yes, it
was a potentially serious defect, but they fixed that. It's a gun, many
defects are dangerous. All guns fail from time to time, but if the XDS
proves reliable going forward, what would you point to to support your
statement? Is the trigger not good? Is the gun not inherently accurate
enough? Does it smell? ;) BTW, I do not own an XD or a Springfield product.
I shoot Glock and S&W, but I'm not opposed to owning an XD.
bigbird21313: you suck, springfield are good quality. you wish you could have a gun
company...if you did they will suck...hahahaha i payed 450.00 for my xd 40
full package brand new...shoots like a champ.
Steven Durham: They may be a little pricey, but they are well made guns. Just asked the
badjujuR6: I cant decide if I like my Glock 19 or my Springfield XD-9mm 4in service
model better. They both launch bullets with repeatable accuracy at around
the 1-2 inch mark at 21 feet. The XD does have an ambi mag release. I try
to train with both hands, and having an ambi safety is nice, it not
nessasary. My glock 19 was less $.
Ryan Holbert: the only thing i got from this video is that youre mad springfield took
over the pistol, and made it their own.
Safet Sabani: Ok I have to say this to you. I'm from Croatia and gun you are talking
about is called HS 2000 XD. Only in USA it's called SPRINGFIELD XD. It's
not because HS Produkt wanted it like that to make it more expensive. Price
is still the same. But name is not so reason it's more expensive now is
becuse SPRINGFIELD ARMORY want it to be more expensive. My point is
that SPRINGFIELD XD or HS 2000 XD are the same gun but those 150 - 200 $
more is what name costs. To you that gun sucks and reason I didn't say
anything about that is because I respect your right to your opinion .
MrLaboy2: Glock 19 $600 comes with 1 mag and a cheap case. XD9 $520 comes with 2
mags, cleaning rod, holster, mag holster, and a nice foam insulated case.
Now what was that about them being inflated and not of value?
END6987: thanks for the history lesson that everyone knows already. maybe in the
video you should had said why you dislike it. i dont know where you saw
this guns forsale but my xdm was only $50 more then a glock and $70 more
then the m&p. why did i pay more for it i liked the features and feel. I
really wanted to get a m&p but something about it trigger guard bugged me
when shooting and holding the gun. xdm 3.8 and xdm 5.25 comp and now
looking to get a xds.
Michael Hess: This video was very helpful. Reason being, it helps a new gun owner like
myself by educating us on the difference between a gun that is worth the
price they are asking for and ones that aren't. I guess my question would
be, are Croatian guns poorly made and that's why they aren't worth the
asking price? Thank you for the Intel!
Ryan Holbert: S&W M&P's are more relatable to ruger p series than anything
Noe Sanchez: Sir I understand where you're coming from, but I've had my Springfield XD
for about year and a half and not once did it ever let me down, I was never
disappointed. I bought mine for about 450 I also bought it used, but 5
months later a brand-new XD costed even less than that. But if you think
about it sir, the way the people looked at the AK when it first came out is
the exact same way people saw the original H2000, the same way you are
looking at it now. Whatever you say about my pistol is irrelevant because
it suits my needs not yours, personal preference is a factor in the gun
shooting world equation that you cannot overlook.
DudeNumberOnePlus: Glock costs 75 bucks to make. Just so you know.
SWF11000: Your a cry baby dude....
Steve McC: I would suggest that you first define "suck." Then give at least 2 reasons
why it sucks. Then you must defend each reason with a valid argument. This
seems like a lobbying campaign, not an analysis.
Timothy Mason: I know this video is more than a year old but I just came upon it. I
cannot help but agree on your points about Springfield Armory USA basically
being a sham. I had no idea until I saw this video which in all honesty is
very sad. Not just sad because somebody is riding the coat tails of a
great American brand but that such an iconic part of American history went
belly up in the first place. All that is to say I do have to agree with
others that you transferred your well justified feelings about the company
to what I feel is a good product.
When I bought my XDM I bought it because I felt it was the right gun FOR
ME. Ergonomically it felt right in my hand much more so than the Glock and
others. I for one really like the grip safety. I know others hate the
grip safety. There are some important design elements you could have
brought up but didn't such as only one set of metal rail guides with the
other two being polymer. That would be an excellent point, but you chose
not to bring that up because you focused on the company and how the weapon
came to be.
The XD series have some fine points and many love them. They have some bad
points too. My basic premise remains that your choice of your weapon is
just that: YOUR CHOICE. Being informed prior to purchase is a great idea.
Searching reviews is a great way to be informed. So this review would be
a lot better if you said I don't like the XD because you think the grip
safety is a bad design concept or the internal construction could use some
beefing up or you think the trigger sucks. You didn't go there. You
instead ranted for five minutes on how much you hate Springfield USA. As I
said above those are valid points and you should have made a video on that
alone then another one on why you hate the XD. Would have been more
informative for those of us seeking information before purchase.
But, hey, I could be wrong. Its happened before
Ricardo Rivera: I see your argument, pretty crapty the way the XD came to be I suppose.
Regardless, it's a great gun. I paid no where near $600 For mine and I have
yet to have a single issue/problem with it. I was searching for a video
that show faults with the XD, if any, and I came across this one; however
your issue seems to be the company and not the firearm.
Nedo Vekic: Buddy they are not overpriced they were under priced because the
manufacturer is a small company called IM Metal witch in 2001 changed there
name to HS product they dident have marketing and when they got a deal to
sell there product they dident hesitate to sell on the thousands that were
orderd considering the cheap labor. So dont hate the HS2000
Jaysen Basu: I guess you made your point. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. This
video didn't prove to me why my XD40 sucks, it just told me your opinion of
it. For what it's worth, I think my XD40 is amazing. That's my opinion. Our
opinions don't change the way our firearms perform. If the stuff hits the
fan I know I can count on my XD.
Zanthony robin: I love mine xd9. It's comfortable and it fits me perfectly. It has the
glock trigger safty and a 1911 pistol grip safty, also two i love:)
anything is better then a high point.
boogie27896: so they suck because of the price huh. judge the gun on its performance.I
have a couple taurus guns tcp and a judge i have rugers and keltecs, xd 40
is my all around favorite out of them all.i like them all for differant
reasons but if i have to have one pistol its the xd hands down
FordFracture: I've got 2 XD'S and I like them they are a good rock solid pistol and
reliable and I think they are a little over priced but not by much . Now
this guy's video is way out of line and the quality and the name and about
the intention of the company springfield arms . I'm afraid your gonna see
that in all gun company's these days . with that being said don't believe
everything you hear go out pick one up hold it feel it shot it and if it
feels right buy it . You can read all the reviews till you go crazy but it
all comes down to you and your interpretation of quality . Now remember
it's not a 1,900 dollar Kimber it's a 600 dollar XD if you want a gun that
you can put in your holster and not worry about it getting beat up this
might be the gun for you .
mike p: Springfield is the best polymer hand gun on the market
Nicholas Flores: I just purchased a xds .45 about a month ago and it is the best firearm
I've ever owned! I've put a couple hundred rounds through it and have yet
to have a malfunction (knock on wood). Although you stated some interesting
facts! Thanks man
Jeff Go: Did the dude with a Miller T-shirt actually say 'illi-noise?"
Informative video nonetheless, but I still love my Xds and they fit my
girlie hands better than any Block..
Edwin Combs: I now own an XDM 5.25 in 40S&W and I can tell anyone who wants to think
that they are a cheap gun, that you don't know what you are talking about.
It's a tightly made tool that is extremely accurate. The entire package for
my gun said quality. Everything from the case it came in to the mags are
well made. I could care less if the gun was made in Croatia instead of the
US or that Springfield Armory is just a name that a company uses because of
the historical implications. Glocks are not made in the US and they are
highly used in this country and hold a lot of respect for their
reliability. Springfield Armory found a high quality gun oversea and
marketed it in the US. That's called business.
ScreamingSkullSaloon: I personally agree with him about Glocks and M&P's being superior firearms.
Do not get me wrong XDs and especially XDM's are extremely accurate. From
what I have seen on Youtube and in person XD's have a little better
accuracy than stock Glocks and M&P's, However the quality is not as good as
many other handguns in their price range. I don't think that XD's "suck" I
just think that one can get much more for how much they go for. But hey if
they work for you best then more power to ya!
Brandon Richardson: I think you should have titled the video. Why I hate Springfield armory.
moderndesignworks: I don't think Rob Leatham will work for Springfield and endorse Springfield
if Springfield makes junks.
Journey4Lyfe: I own both XD 40 and a Glock 22. I prefer the XD for 3 reasons.
1. Fits better in my hand
2. Added 1911 safety
3. Sits a bit higher than the G22 again more comfortable for myself.
Both are good IMO.
Dino Maris: Sooo... when you are going to explain why the gun itself sucks?
bmxxxxxxxx: So I watched the whole video, can someone tell me what's wrong with a
David V: The XD 9 essential package sells for under $400..
Bob Michetti: I've owned Glocks, I've owned Sigs and Smith & Wesson, My XD 40 is the best
gun i have every owned. to say it sucks shows your lack of knowledge in
firearms, Oh and PS lose the tongue ring it makes you look like a pot
Eric Schwarz: I have a feeling you don't know as much as you think you know. I bet there
are plenty hidden changes to justify the price to make the gun firer
better. How about doing some real research inside of saying "This one,
looks like that one."
iwantosavemoney: I agree 100%
jjkvist: so you just think they cost too much? well they are well made - even a lot
of glock loyalist will agree they are better made - and the logo is not the
same as the original logo it actually says croatia in it... but regardless
- any real reasons as why they suck? a mercedes does not suck because it
cost a lot and is not american made - that is not a real argument against
the product... just looking for a good negative video against xd and
honestly, i cant find one
thepwee: Maybe change the title. I bought mine for 450. there on sale for 400.
I think of this just like the Taurus PT-92 isnt it the same..???? you love
that gun which is a Beretta 92 with a few changes...most of your videos are
good. But what a load of BS on this one